16GB Clip MP3 Player with Bluetooth, Sports Watch MP3 Player with Touch Screen, Mini MP3 Player with Headphones,Voice Recorder,E-Book,Video Play,HiFi Lossless Sound Music Player for Running, 1.5 Inch 4.0 out of 5 stars 690. 32GB Clip MP3 Player with Bluetooth, Mini Sports MP3 Player with Touch Screen, Portable Music Player with Pedometer, FM Radio, Voice Recorder, Earphone for Running, TF Card Slot Support up to 128GB 4.2 out of 5 stars 99. This portable music player supports many streaming services like Spotify, Amazon Unlimited, Google Play, SoundCloud and so to. Compared to other MP3 players such as iPod, Sony Walkman Spotify player device usually has the advantages of better sound quality, more storage capacity, high power for long time use, making it best for the heavy music. Saregama Carvaan Mini 2.0 Shrimad Bhagavad Gita- Music Player with Bluetooth/FM/AM/AUX (Saffron Orange) 3.9 out of 5 stars 278 ₹1,941 ₹ 1,941 ₹2,490 ₹2,490 Save ₹549 (22%).
With Amazon having finally released their long awaited stand-alone streaming service, the $7.99 sticker price seems to be bucking an industry trend by offering consumers unlimited streaming for less, but the figure is deceptive.
_______________________
Guest Post by Bobby Owsinski on Music 3.0
Amazon Music Player Download
Amazon has finally launched it’s long awaited stand-alone streaming music service and it’s called Amazon Music Unlimited. On the surface it has a number of interesting features that differentiate it from the other major streaming services, but one has to wonder whether potential users will find them compelling enough to subscribe.
Perhaps the service’s biggest feature is price. If you’re already an Amazon Prime customer, Amazon Music Unlimited is available for just $7.99 per month or $79 per year, undercutting the norm of $9.99 per month charged by most other services. If you’re not a Prime customer however, you’ll still be charged the customary $9.99 per month.
Windows Mini Player
If you happen to own an Amazon Echo, Echo Dot or Amazon Tap device, the price is even lower at $3.99 per month, but music playback only works on that device. If you want to receive the full Amazon Music service on your phone, for instance, you’ll still need to pony up for the full Unlimited tier at either $7.99 monthly if you’re a Prime member, or $9.99 if you’re not.
On the surface this seems pretty interesting in that a lower price for streaming is what major industry consultants have been advising for years. Even back at the peak of the CD boom, the average music buyer never purchased $120 worth of music per year, as is the case now with a $9.99 per month streaming plan. Though there’s been a decent amount of streaming penetration at that price point, it’s still only 10% or less in some territories, according to industry punditMark Mulligan. Potential subscribers that might not ever buy at $9.99 are more likely to change their minds if that monthly threshold was lower.
That’s why Amazon Music Unlimited’s $7.99 per month price point looks so inviting. It’s a step in bringing that monthly fee more in line with the expectations of the greatest number of users.
The problem is that this price is really a mirage.
You have to be an Amazon Prime member in order to have access to the $7.99 price, and this is after you’ve already payed $99 for your Amazon Prime subscription for the year. And, as a Prime member, you already have Amazon’s Prime Music service available to you for free, so why would you want to pay the extra 8 bucks a month for something that you’ve already paid for?
/article-new/2019/03/amazon-music-desktop-800x514.jpg?lossy "Mini player myspace")
To be fair, Amazon Music Unlimited is different from Prime Music in a number of ways. There are a lot more songs available (Amazon will only say its in the “tens of millions” as compared to Prime Music’s two million), there are curated playlists, behind-the-scenes artist commentaries, and a new app. Is that worth the extra money per month? It will be interesting to see just how many of the estimated 60 million Prime members say, “Yes it is!” [Read more on Forbes]